Review



anti amigo2 antibody  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti amigo2 antibody
    a Expression of <t>AMIGO2,</t> STC2, INHBA, DKK1, VEGFC, SPOCK1, MT1E, and FOXD1 in scRNA-seq UMAP plots. b Bar plot showing cell type proportions under LRS subtypes from scRNA-seq data. c AMIGO2, ranked highly for prognostic importance, was selected for further analysis. d AMIGO2 expression is upregulated in most tumor tissues across various cancers in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. e Evaluation of AMIGO2’s prognostic value (OS) in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. f Correlation analysis between AMIGO2 expression and representative signatures in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. Ns: no significant difference, * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.
    Anti Amigo2 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 18 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sc+373699/AMIGO2+Antibody/pmc12627550-331-11-13
    Average 93 stars, based on 18 article reviews
    anti amigo2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling of HNSCC identifies AMIGO2 as a therapeutic target modulating tumor microenvironment"

    Article Title: Metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling of HNSCC identifies AMIGO2 as a therapeutic target modulating tumor microenvironment

    Journal: NPJ Precision Oncology

    doi: 10.1038/s41698-025-01132-z

    a Expression of AMIGO2, STC2, INHBA, DKK1, VEGFC, SPOCK1, MT1E, and FOXD1 in scRNA-seq UMAP plots. b Bar plot showing cell type proportions under LRS subtypes from scRNA-seq data. c AMIGO2, ranked highly for prognostic importance, was selected for further analysis. d AMIGO2 expression is upregulated in most tumor tissues across various cancers in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. e Evaluation of AMIGO2’s prognostic value (OS) in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. f Correlation analysis between AMIGO2 expression and representative signatures in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. Ns: no significant difference, * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a Expression of AMIGO2, STC2, INHBA, DKK1, VEGFC, SPOCK1, MT1E, and FOXD1 in scRNA-seq UMAP plots. b Bar plot showing cell type proportions under LRS subtypes from scRNA-seq data. c AMIGO2, ranked highly for prognostic importance, was selected for further analysis. d AMIGO2 expression is upregulated in most tumor tissues across various cancers in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. e Evaluation of AMIGO2’s prognostic value (OS) in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. f Correlation analysis between AMIGO2 expression and representative signatures in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. Ns: no significant difference, * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Expressing

    a IHC images and quantitative statistics of AMIGO2 expression in adjacent normal tissue, precancerous lesions, and tumor tissues. b Representative images and quantification of CD8, CD56, FAP, and PanCK staining in tumor tissues from high-AMIGO2 and low-AMIGO2 patient groups. c Graphical abstract for this study. Ns: no significant difference. * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a IHC images and quantitative statistics of AMIGO2 expression in adjacent normal tissue, precancerous lesions, and tumor tissues. b Representative images and quantification of CD8, CD56, FAP, and PanCK staining in tumor tissues from high-AMIGO2 and low-AMIGO2 patient groups. c Graphical abstract for this study. Ns: no significant difference. * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Staining

    Related Articles

    Membrane:

    Article Title: Amigo2 -upregulation in Tumour Cells Facilitates Their Attachment to Liver Endothelial Cells Resulting in Liver Metastases
    Article Snippet: One hundred micrograms of protein was subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under a reducing condition and then blotted to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (ISEQ00010, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). .. This membrane was incubated with the mouse monoclonal anti-Amigo2 antibody diluted 1:25 (clone G-7; sc-373699, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or with the mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody diluted 1:2000 (clone AC-15; A5441, Sigma Aldrich), and then with peroxidase-conjugated goat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG antibody diluted 1:2000 (PM009-7; Medical & Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Japan). .. The signals were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence ECL kit (RPN2232, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK).

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Amigo2 -upregulation in Tumour Cells Facilitates Their Attachment to Liver Endothelial Cells Resulting in Liver Metastases
    Article Snippet: One hundred micrograms of protein was subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under a reducing condition and then blotted to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (ISEQ00010, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). .. This membrane was incubated with the mouse monoclonal anti-Amigo2 antibody diluted 1:25 (clone G-7; sc-373699, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or with the mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody diluted 1:2000 (clone AC-15; A5441, Sigma Aldrich), and then with peroxidase-conjugated goat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG antibody diluted 1:2000 (PM009-7; Medical & Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Japan). .. The signals were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence ECL kit (RPN2232, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK).



    Similar Products

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti amigo2 antibody
    a Expression of <t>AMIGO2,</t> STC2, INHBA, DKK1, VEGFC, SPOCK1, MT1E, and FOXD1 in scRNA-seq UMAP plots. b Bar plot showing cell type proportions under LRS subtypes from scRNA-seq data. c AMIGO2, ranked highly for prognostic importance, was selected for further analysis. d AMIGO2 expression is upregulated in most tumor tissues across various cancers in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. e Evaluation of AMIGO2’s prognostic value (OS) in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. f Correlation analysis between AMIGO2 expression and representative signatures in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. Ns: no significant difference, * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.
    Anti Amigo2 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sc+373699/AMIGO2+Antibody/pmc12627550-331-11-13
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti amigo2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology rabbit polyclonal anti amigo2 antibody
    Fig. 3. Suppression of <t>AMIGO2</t> mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Amigo2 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sc+373699/AMIGO2+Antibody/pm39548119-218-26-14
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti amigo2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti amigo2 antibody
    Fig. 3. Suppression of <t>AMIGO2</t> mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Amigo2 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sc+373699/AMIGO2+Antibody/pm39548119-218-8-14
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti amigo2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti amigo2
    Fig. 3. Suppression of <t>AMIGO2</t> mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.
    Anti Amigo2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sc+373699/AMIGO2+Antibody/pmc11638658-60-2-8
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti amigo2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse iga anti amigo2
    Fig. 3. Suppression of <t>AMIGO2</t> mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.
    Mouse Iga Anti Amigo2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sc+373699/AMIGO2+Antibody/pm39523830-65-0-8
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse iga anti amigo2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology amigo2 antibody
    Fig. 3. Suppression of <t>AMIGO2</t> mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.
    Amigo2 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sc+373699/AMIGO2+Antibody/pm38978149-92-10-13
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    amigo2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti amigo2
    Fig. 3. Suppression of <t>AMIGO2</t> mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.
    Mouse Anti Amigo2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/sc+373699/AMIGO2+Antibody/pm38432455-66-30-35
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti amigo2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a Expression of AMIGO2, STC2, INHBA, DKK1, VEGFC, SPOCK1, MT1E, and FOXD1 in scRNA-seq UMAP plots. b Bar plot showing cell type proportions under LRS subtypes from scRNA-seq data. c AMIGO2, ranked highly for prognostic importance, was selected for further analysis. d AMIGO2 expression is upregulated in most tumor tissues across various cancers in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. e Evaluation of AMIGO2’s prognostic value (OS) in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. f Correlation analysis between AMIGO2 expression and representative signatures in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. Ns: no significant difference, * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.

    Journal: NPJ Precision Oncology

    Article Title: Metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling of HNSCC identifies AMIGO2 as a therapeutic target modulating tumor microenvironment

    doi: 10.1038/s41698-025-01132-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Expression of AMIGO2, STC2, INHBA, DKK1, VEGFC, SPOCK1, MT1E, and FOXD1 in scRNA-seq UMAP plots. b Bar plot showing cell type proportions under LRS subtypes from scRNA-seq data. c AMIGO2, ranked highly for prognostic importance, was selected for further analysis. d AMIGO2 expression is upregulated in most tumor tissues across various cancers in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. e Evaluation of AMIGO2’s prognostic value (OS) in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. f Correlation analysis between AMIGO2 expression and representative signatures in TCGA pan-cancer dataset. Ns: no significant difference, * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.

    Article Snippet: The precleared lysates were then incubated overnight at 4°C with either anti-AMIGO2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat# sc-373699, RRID: AB_10920216) or anti-PDK1 antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A302-130A, RRID:AB_1720395).

    Techniques: Expressing

    a IHC images and quantitative statistics of AMIGO2 expression in adjacent normal tissue, precancerous lesions, and tumor tissues. b Representative images and quantification of CD8, CD56, FAP, and PanCK staining in tumor tissues from high-AMIGO2 and low-AMIGO2 patient groups. c Graphical abstract for this study. Ns: no significant difference. * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.

    Journal: NPJ Precision Oncology

    Article Title: Metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling of HNSCC identifies AMIGO2 as a therapeutic target modulating tumor microenvironment

    doi: 10.1038/s41698-025-01132-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a IHC images and quantitative statistics of AMIGO2 expression in adjacent normal tissue, precancerous lesions, and tumor tissues. b Representative images and quantification of CD8, CD56, FAP, and PanCK staining in tumor tissues from high-AMIGO2 and low-AMIGO2 patient groups. c Graphical abstract for this study. Ns: no significant difference. * P < 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001.

    Article Snippet: The precleared lysates were then incubated overnight at 4°C with either anti-AMIGO2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat# sc-373699, RRID: AB_10920216) or anti-PDK1 antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A302-130A, RRID:AB_1720395).

    Techniques: Expressing, Staining

    Fig. 3. Suppression of AMIGO2 mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.

    Journal: Scientific reports

    Article Title: Prevention of liver metastasis via the pharmacological suppression of AMIGO2 expression in tumor cells.

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71827-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3. Suppression of AMIGO2 mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.

    Article Snippet: For LV12 cells, the membranes were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-AMIGO2 antibody (G-7; sc-373699, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at a 1:50 dilution or rabbit polyclonal anti-AMIGO2 antibody (LS-C401236; LS Bio, Shirley, MA, USA) at a 1:1,000 dilution, and then with peroxidase-conjugated goat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG antibody at a 1:2,000 dilution (PM009-7; Medical & Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Japan) or peroxidase-conjugated goat polyclonal anti-rabbit IgG antibody at a 1:2,000 dilution (ab97080; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), respectively.

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Labeling, Fluorescence

    Fig. 3. Suppression of AMIGO2 mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.

    Journal: Scientific reports

    Article Title: Prevention of liver metastasis via the pharmacological suppression of AMIGO2 expression in tumor cells.

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71827-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3. Suppression of AMIGO2 mRNA and protein expression in LV12 cells treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, and SP600125 and their reduced adhesion to mouse liver sinusoidal endothelial (HSE) cells. (a) LV12 cells were treated with trametinib, ruxolitinib, SP600125, or DMSO for 24 h. The relative AMIGO2 mRNA levels in each drug treatment group, compared with that in DMSO-treated LV12 cells, was determined using qRT-PCR. The bar graphs show mean ± SD from three to five independent experiments (n = 9–15, Student’s t-test). (b) Immunoreactive AMIGO2 expression was quantified as a ratio to β-actin expression using densitometry. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 7, Student’s t-test) from at least six independent experiments with similar results. (c) Typical immunoblotting performed using anti-AMIGO2 is shown in the upper panel, and the lower panel presents immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. (d) LV12 cells treated as described in “a” were labeled with PKH67 fluorescent dye and placed on HSE cells. The percentage of adherent cells was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The graph shows mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group, Student’s t-test) from four independent experiments with similar results.

    Article Snippet: For LV12 cells, the membranes were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-AMIGO2 antibody (G-7; sc-373699, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at a 1:50 dilution or rabbit polyclonal anti-AMIGO2 antibody (LS-C401236; LS Bio, Shirley, MA, USA) at a 1:1,000 dilution, and then with peroxidase-conjugated goat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG antibody at a 1:2,000 dilution (PM009-7; Medical & Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Japan) or peroxidase-conjugated goat polyclonal anti-rabbit IgG antibody at a 1:2,000 dilution (ab97080; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), respectively.

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Labeling, Fluorescence